Orders rejected for missing return address

Löst

Incident Resolved: CTIM-627
After reviewing and updating the FDO mappings, the missing delivery option has been restored. This is confirmed from Product Ops and BoxUp. This issue is now contained.
Please contact Platform Support or see ticket for more details.

Uppdaterad

Incident Updated: BoxUp noticed that after the issue from yesterday was resolved, there was a missing shipping option (RUSH EDO) for the affected product. While this option doesn’t apply directly as a TLS shipping method, it indicates the quickest option for expected delivery. Product Ops and Dispatch have reviewed the issue to align the FDO and EDO parameters, which should be completed by tomorrow.

Löst

Incident Resolved: CTIM-627
Test order was successfully sent to production. The incident is considered contained, although teams will follow up tomorrow to discuss next steps to ensure the problem won’t reappear due to the various changes/updates made to the product configurations.
Please contact Platform Support or see ticket for more details.

Uppdaterad

Incident Updated: Product Ops has identified some additional configurations that need to be mapped for SiteFlow (that were not apparent during testing). It was also noted that certain changes made to the product options has likely resulted in a chain effect that affected the required pricing and supplier data. Currently retesting to verify changes.

Uppdaterad

Incident Updated: Product Ops has found that a name change is likely causing the error and will need to be updated by BoxUp. Once we can confirm this is fixed, we’ll try to test the orders again.

Uppdaterad

Incident Updated: The updated RAS config was successful in providing the correct return address info, although the test order was rejected for a mismatched fulfiller product ID. Issue is ongoing.

Uppdaterad

Incident Updated: Updated config for the RAS has been completed and teams are currently testing to verify.

Uppdaterad

Incident Updated: Snorlax squad has verified the issue and are considering various changes that would remediate the problem. Will provide another update as soon as a fix has been implemented.

Uppdaterad

Incident Updated: Logistics and Product Ops team continue to investigate the problem. It’s confirmed that SiteFlow rejected orders due to missing address info (failed to process baton). Snorlax squad was included, but there’s ongoing discussion around where a fix could be implemented (return address service, possibly).

Uppdaterad

Incident Updated: Logistics support has identified that no default return address exists for TLS, and orders without a return address will be rejected. Support teams are currently evaluating options since updating the address to use the BoxUp location could affect other business units that use the same UPS accounts.

Utreder

New Incident: CTIM-627
Priority: High
Escalation sent to: Logistics Support for review.
Requesting assistance from Logistics (specifically, Snorlax Squad) to assist with an ongoing issue affecting BoxUp orders. Previous investigation into an issue with rejected orders placed for a new product shows problems with a missing return address. Ecommerce and Product Operations have reviewed the problem and need some assistance from Logistics squads.

2 berörda tjänster: